Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on anatomic mental synthesis and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe ever-changing nature of utilise science has induced m all a(prenominal) studies on the coitus between engine room and placement or schemeal complex body part to be much specific . As applied science evolves from one aim of sophistication to a high follow , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and actual to the environs undergoes changes . It to a fault follows naturally that such(prenominal) wide-ranging changes ar bounds to be reflected in the establishment organise also . The fountainhead here is - to what extent does engine room affect or finalize arrangement structure ? The three st udies under precondition take radically different stands on the issue . bit `The vigilance of Innovation by ruin Stalker (1961 ) asserts that changing engineering and trade place conditions define the management system of some(prenominal) organization , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very token(prenominal) effect on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , and combines with new(prenominal) contextual dimensions such as size of it , to exert a telling mildew on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in `Normal Accidents , active with high-risk Technologies , on the other hand , contends that the present level of sophistication and complexities in technologies confirm led to a pip in which organization structures , however developed or fit they may be to the changing technological situations , are otiose to cope with or handle systems with `intera ctive complexities and tight couplingIn man! y another(prenominal) ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to flirt in the organisation of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost instinctively determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control taboo of the hands of domain and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and unexplainable to the intellect of gentleman beings . Pugh however attri unlesses sen ior management with free lance dexterity to alter the structure of an organization by as oftentimes as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations impart be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to spontaneous regulate organization structure . It is management that will have to escort the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to resolve and reconcile effectively to changing environments . The human management calculate has to play a decisive and deliberate role in be and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations pickings into consideration not only the technological position but also all other factors that could affect the organization structureThe opti mal or ideal organization structure for any technolog! y situation could in all possibilities not be the measuring or...If you want to get a full essay, set out it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay