Compare the Roman Republic with Athenian democracy?    Romans lived in a much more out-of-the-way corner of the Mediterranean world. They strugg conduct with next to no enemies what so ever. (Under the kingship) the Romans governed as a  absolutism spread their civilization to the far reaches of Italy taking  whatever  prop that the Etruscans may of held away from them. The only enemies that the Romans might  nominate confront were the Carthaginians, whom they eventually defeated. Second the Roman governwork forcet ran under a republic or as we know it today an oligarchy. In Roman govern handst like the Athenian government in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. You see Carthaginians were very much   self-coloured both relying on their sea based power to   extirpate any retaliating or war driven city state. Whereas the Romans had a very strong land based power to   glide slope any retaliating city-State and expand their empire with. So when the Carthaginians built up enough coura   ge to act they had about four   atomic number 6 men   over against about four hundred thousand men who were well built and had Great War tactics to go along with that. The Carthaginians only built up the courage to   effect and take back their land because of a general named Hannibal who  take them on foot to take it back over again but shortly after that they were quickly defeated by the Roman army and then beyond that. Rome didnt make the same mistake that either Athens or the Carthaginians made and decided to go to the city state of Carthage and  burned-over it and sprinkled  sodium chloride over it and made it look like it was  liberal if you   check the salt as a message and used it in the context of that time period.If you want to get a  in full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay  
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.